Performance of seven consumer sleep-tracking devices compared with polysomnography

Chinoy ED, Cuellar JA, Huwa KE, et al. · Sleep 44(5):zsaa291 · 2021

Key finding

Consumer devices estimated total sleep well but were poor at sleep stages — trust duration, not deep/REM.

Citation

Authors
Chinoy ED, Cuellar JA, Huwa KE, et al.
Published in
Sleep 44(5):zsaa291
Year
2021
Topic
Wearables & tracking

Read the paper ↗

Related guides

How you feel is the primary metricFrom 'how do you feel' to a sleep studyWhat to trust on your wearable

Related studies

OrthosomniaCase series of people whose fixation on tracker data worsened their sleep — Galpin's health-anxiety warning has a name.Wearable sleep technology in clinical and research settingsReview of what wearables can and cannot measure; stage classification and 'sleep scores' lack validation.

Track it, don't guess it

SleepShred turns this research into a 20-second daily habit: log your night, see which of your own behaviours move your sleep, and screen for the disorders nobody diagnoses.

Get SleepShred for iPhone

Educational summary of published research, not medical advice. Screening scores are not diagnoses. If a score is elevated or you feel unwell, talk to a clinician.